In discussing the
Passover events up to and including the Exodus, it was noted that the Sadducees and
the Pharisees held different interpretations of the timeline associated with
those events.
The Sadducees
believed that the Passover events, including the slaying of lambs and the painting
of Hebrew doors, the eating of the
Passover meal, the angel’s pass
over of Hebrew homes, the smiting of Egyptians, and the night journey out of
Egypt, all took place on Nisan 14.
The Pharisees, on
the other hand, believed that only the slaying of lambs and the painting
of Hebrew doors took place on
Nisan 14 and the other events, beginning with the Passover meal, occurred the
following day, on Nisan 15.
The Sadducees and
the Pharisees agreed on only one point.
The Passover lambs were sacrificed on Nisan 14.
“Now the feast of the Passover and Unleavened Bread was two days off; and the chief priests and the scribes were seeking how to seize Him by stealth, and kill Him." (Mark 14:1)
“And on the first day of the feast of Unleavened Bread, when the Passover lamb was being sacrificed, His disciples said to Him, ‘Where do You want us to go and prepare for You to eat the Passover?’” (Mark 14:12)
In Mark 14:1, the
author made a distinction between the Lord’s
Passover and the Feast of Unleavened Bread.
God’s original intention was that the single day Lord’s Passover, on Nisan 14, and the seven day
Feast of Unleavened Bread, beginning on Nisan 15, would be observed as two separate feasts. However, in Mark 14:12, the
author described the two feasts as one celebration. Regardless, when he said, “the first day of
the feast of Unleavened Bread, when the Passover lamb was being sacrificed,” he
was referring to Nisan 14.
So at what time, on
Nisan 14, did Christ’s disciples ask, “Where do You want us to go and prepare
for You to eat the Passover?” Was it in
the evening at the beginning of Nisan 14, according to the custom of the
Sadducees or was it in the afternoon near the end of Nisan 14, according to the
tradition of the Pharisees?
The Gospels of Matthew, Mark, and Luke document the late night events leading up to Christ's Crucifixion. Additional information is revealed in the Gospel of John.
“So the Roman cohort and the commander, and the officers of the Jews, arrested Jesus and bound Him, and led Him to Annas first; for he was the father-in-law of Caiaphas, who was the high priest that year…Annas therefore sent Him bound to Caiaphas the high priest…They led Jesus therefore from Caiaphas into the Praetorium; and it was early; and they themselves did not enter into the Praetorium in order that they might not be defiled, but might eat the Passover.” (John 18:12-13,24,28)
Notably, Jesus was delivered to Pilate by the whole council. (Mark 15:1; Luke 23:1)
After His arrest and trial before the Council of the Jews, they
transferred Him to the Praetorium which was Pontius Pilate’s palace that served as the governor’s
official residence and the hall of judgment.
Those who delivered Jesus wouldn’t set foot in the palace. Why?
Because they didn’t want to defile themselves before they ate the
Passover. It was unlawful for a Jew to
come in contact with a Roman or any uncircumcised Gentile prior to eating the
Passover.
Now what exactly was the Council of the Jews? Let's investigate.
The Council of the Jews was called the Sanhedrin. The Lesser Sanhedrin was a panel of 23 members. The Great Sanhedrin was the 71 member council in its entirety which convened for matters of national importance. It was comprised of both Sadducees and Pharisees. Annas was undoubtedly a Sadducee. It is more than likely that his son-in-law Caiaphas was a Sadducee as well.
Officially, there was only one high priest. He was appointed by the Roman governor of Judea. At the time of Our Lord's execution, Caiaphas held that office. His father-in -law Annas also received the respect due the high priest. Not only was he a former holder of that office, but also head of the most prominent high priestly family; his son-in law and five sons had tenures as high priest. Notably, there were chief priests in addition to the high priest as confirmed in Matthew 26:3, "Then the chief priests and the elders of the people were gathered together in the court of the high priest, named Caiaphas." Chief priests were the principal accusers when Christ came before Pilate.
Because Caiaphas and Annas were only identified at Christ's preliminary trial before the Sanhedrin, it's more than likely that the Lesser Sanhedrin delivered Christ to Pilate and that its 23 members were all Pharisees. However, if the Great Sanhedrin delivered Christ to Pilate, it's possible, because of the size of the Passover celebration in 30 AD, that the Sadducee members ate the Passover according to the more practical tradition of the Pharisees, as discussed in part three.
In summary, Christ ate the Passover meal just after dark on Nisan 14. Later that same night, He was arrested and tried
by the Sanhedrin. Early the next morning,
they delivered Him to Pontius Pilate where He was sentenced to death by
crucifixion. He was pronounced dead at 3
PM on Nissan 14. In the evening
following His death, after the sun had set, the day changed to Nisan 15. It was then that those who delivered Christ to Pilate ate the
Passover meal according to the tradition of the Pharisees.
Therefore, when
Christ’s disciples asked Him where they should go to prepare the Passover, it was evening, at the beginning of Nisan 14. Jesus ate the Passover just after dark, that same night, according to the command of the God of Israel, “…you
shall sacrifice the Passover in the evening at sunset, at the time that you
came out of Egypt. And you shall cook it
and eat it in the place where the Lord your God chooses.” (Deuteronomy 16:6-7)
Did the Sadducees eat the Passover according to their custom in 30 AD? Some historians have suggested that because of size of the celebration and the number of lambs that were sacrificed, the sacrificial period had to be extended beyond the period between sunset and darkness on Nisan 14. Extending it back into the daylight hours of Nisan 13 wasn’t an option. The Passover lambs had to be sacrificed on Nisan 14. Moreover, it wasn’t sensible to sacrifice the lambs after dark. The only workable solution was to move the sacrifice to the following afternoon, the sacrificial period observed by the Pharisees. Therefore, it’s unlikely that the Sadducees ate the Passover according to their custom in 30 AD, the year of Christ’s crucifixion.
ReplyDeleteWere the chief priests Sadducees? Not necessarily. Shaye Cohen, author of “From the Maccabees to the Mishnah” said, “not all priests, high priests, and aristocrats were Sadducees; many were Pharisees, and many were not members of any group at all.”
ReplyDelete